最近 作者: 主题: 内容:
 进入版区才能发表文章 
 您当前的位置: 推理之门 > 主题版区 > 福尔摩斯   【版主】:跳舞的小人,福尔摩斯 字体大小:
[1] [2]1页/共2页(总计17个回复) 下页
主 题: (18楼附粗陋翻译)以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论文(人气:1344)
 柏之晓shiloh打开柏之晓的博客
1 楼: (18楼附粗陋翻译)以福尔摩斯为主题... 12年06月04日20点36分





【柏之晓在大作中谈到:】




【福尔摩斯在大作中谈到:】

楼主介意把概括总结的中文拿出来分享吗?



Net.1. 艾琳·艾德勒:伪完美女人
bbsShowDetail.asp?act=search&fid=193727&aid=35&bid=117

Net.2. 并非冷漠——神探歇洛克福尔摩斯的人性魅力




我写的,我的英语不好,不许笑……


有一些内容是从推门的文章翻译的,在结尾的引文部分注明,算是给学校的老师们介绍了一下推门。不过我相信他们是不会来的。


I.        Holmes’s Emotion

As readers know, from Devil’s Foot, Six Napoleons, Thor Bridge, Three Garridebs and many other stories, that there is a heart beating beneath the apparently cold and austere exterior. The fever of music is another thread to it; he has an ear for the highly emotional music of Wagner. From Watson readers know that Holmes does not undertake any problem that doesn’t accord with his sympathies.

He is an apathetic person loyal to his sympathy.

A.     The Ideal Woman

Among the stories of Holmes, A Scandal in Bohemia is the most favorite one both for the author and reader. A Scandal in Bohemia is different from the other stories in the Canon. Not only is the problem involved basically a personal problem of the King of Bohemia’s—admittedly, being King, his personal problems would never be entirely personal—but you have probably the only time Holmes seems to have any feelings for a woman.

Watson delineates Irene Adler’s unique position in Holmes’s mind at the outset of the story. “To Sherlock Holmes she is always THE woman. I have seldom heard him mention her under any other name. In his eyes she eclipses and predominates the whole of her sex. It was not that he felt any emotion akin to love for Irene Adler.”(Doyle, 1891)

The meaning of the last line is just like that Watson has hidden silver, and emphasizes to others that there isn’t any silver. But Watson’s delineation doesn’t equal Doyle’s opinion.

We don’t actually find out that much about Irene Adler as a person: she’s a contralto singer and a general lady, after some kind of affair with the King of Bohemia, has retired to London. The King of Bohemia hires Holmes to try and recover an unfortunate photograph of the pair—he doesn’t want it to be reached by his soon-to-be-bride before he gets married. While the photograph remains safe, thanks to a promise from Ms. Adler, Holmes does fail to get the picture back from her. In fact, Adler manages to overcome him entirely, and to sail away from the country companied by her husband.

The King of Bohemia is so rough in his efforts to recover the photograph that, even though he’s technically the victim in the story, he seems to us to be the shabbier one by the end of it. Holmes’s respect for wrongdoer Irene Adler’s unconventional honor and grace shows Holmes’s highly personal sense of morality and fairness.

1.        A Wise Woman

The best plans of Mr. Holmes are beaten by a woman’s wit. The temptation of Irene Adler which is wisdom rather than beauty, overwhelms Holmes. The delineation of Adler’s wisdom is indirect. Holmes serves as a foil for her.

Adler’s wisdom is expressed in three aspects: she sees through Holmes’s camouflage in time; she follows the tracks of Holmes to make sure his identity in time; she escapes from Europe in time.

One aware of the danger around, whose intelligence isn’t inferior to normal level would be nervously alert. So does Adler. Secondly, Holmes’s farce is too clumsy to deceive a normal person. Many vagrant children plugs up the door of carriage with stretched hands for money—the pastor enters on the stage to save the beauty—the pastor falls down and is likely to die—he begs the permission into the house—he prays her to open the window—fire alarm—the fireworks are found. Such a series of incidents, among which an independent one may be incidental, is obvious enough to alert a silly. Adler, at the position of a prey, is frightened. So I mean, there isn’t enough proof to support that Adler is in the group where people are tower above the rest in vigor and height of intellect.

Adler has already known that the King would hire no detective except Holmes. But she follows the tracks of Holmes to make sure her suspicion. Her action is unnecessary and meaningless.

She has been honored by the King by means of searching her house and luggage for five times. It is amusing that she still lives in London calmly. But she escapes from Europe as soon as possible before Holmes could do anything with her. The bird doesn’t prepare to fly away until the hunter levels a gun at it. She is not decisive or quick-witted at all.

2.        Holmes’s Rash Behaviour in Presence of a King

At the end of the story, Holmes asks for the photograph of Adler from the King. It is an important proof that Holmes adores Adler.

“I am immensely indebted to you. Pray tell me in what way I can reward you. This ring—”He slipped an emerald snake ring from his finger and held it out upon the palm of his hand.

“Your Majesty has something which I should value even more highly.”

“You have but to name it.”

“This photograph.”

The King stared at him in amazement. (Doyle, 1891)

Trace the photograph back to its owner, Adler. Let us see the letter she leaves for Holmes: “MY DEAR MR SHERLOCK HOLMES – You really did it very well. You took me in completely. Until after the alarm of fire, I had not a suspicion…As to the photograph, your client may rest in peace. I love and am loved by a better man than he. The King may do what he will without hindrance from one whom he has cruelly wronged.” (Doyle, 1891)

    In the letter which is left for Holmes, the part mentioning Holmes is polite and complimentary. The part mentioning the King is cutting and disdainful. Why does a woman look down on a man with sending a beautiful photograph of herself for him as a memento? Actually the photograph is left for Holmes. His innocent companion has misunderstood him. Holmes retains the photograph as a caution lest he will underestimate the opponent for another time.

However, there are details to prove that Holmes admired Adler.

    “‘What a woman – oh, what a woman!’ cried the King of Bohemia. ‘Did I not tell you how quick and resolute she was? Would she not have made an admirable queen? Is it not a pity that she was not no my level?’

    ‘From what I have seen of the lady she seems indeed to be on a very different level to Your Majesty.’ said Holmes coldly. ‘I am sorry that I have not been able to bring Your Majesty’s business to a more successful conclusion.’

    He bowed, and, turning away without observing the hand which the King had stretched out to him.” (Doyle, 1891)

    Readers also have some rude and insulting behavior on Holmes’s part toward a client and a King. He’s very curt with him at their first meeting, insults him by agreeing that Irene is not on the same level as His Majesty, and ignores his preferred handshake at the end of the story.

    Holmes is always polite with his clients otherwise, and it’s hard to picture a late Victorian gentleman like himself behaving like this toward a monarch. Even if the monarch is a bit of a goof, he’s still the King.

    He mocks the King as a corrupted playboy; meanwhile he appreciate Adler’s calculation. His overbearing action is owing to his lost mood, which is so delicate, due to Adler.

    The King has shown himself unworthy of respect, a nobleman but not a noble man. Holmes is, in some ways, out of society. He moves in and out of various social groups but is not really part of any. This most unconventional person makes it his mission to protect the conventional. It has always seemed to me that Holmes is being shown in the role of Knight Errant. He is prepared to travel the land and across the sea in order to battle evildoers. Holmes accepting Irene’s photo at the end, rather than the King’s ring, is the equivalent of a knight wearing a lady’s colours—her token.

[此贴被福尔摩斯于2012-6-10 20:54:02修改过]


  点击复制本贴地址:





破晓时分的柏树林

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 柏之晓shiloh打开柏之晓的博客
2 楼: Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论文 12年06月04日20点39分

I.        Holmes’s Friendship

You couldn’t have a detective without a sidekick, a partner in crime-detection, someone whom you could rely on to assist in your investigations. Holmes’s investigative partner is a man named Dr. John. H. Watson, whom Doyle created based on himself. Doyle’s original name for Holmes’s friend and colleague was Ormond Sacker, however, good taste and common-sense prevailed, and Doyle decided that such a name was unrealistic and too colourful. He decided that his narrator and Holmes’s colleague should have a simpler, more down-to-earth name, something which everyone could relate to. An everyman name such as John Watson. Simple, plain, unpretentious and which could belong to any man in London.

Holmes and Watson first meet in 1881. Watson, like an idiot, marrys Mary Morstan in 1888. By then, he and Holmes have been living in 221B for seven years, and during that time have shared quite a few adventures that by then may have already forged their friendship into a tight bond.

A.     The Definition of Their Relationship by Holmes

Holmes doesn’t always observe social niceties but even he would understand his duty. Besides, he cares about Watson, even if he doesn’t always show it.

Watson serves as a link between Holmes and the society.

1.        The Consideration of Watson as His Friend by Holmes

Holmes likes to call Watson my dear fellow, although he also likes laughing at his dear fellow’s foolishness. We could comprehend his acerbity as familiarity.

He regards Watson as a clumsy fellow and prevents him from danger. But he doesn’t really look upon Watson as his friend. Because he shares joy with Watson, but never shares tears with him. When Watson becomes angry for that, he is touched and delighted.

2.        Need for Friendship

Holmes is always regarded as an asocial freak.

He never builds new friendship initiatively. We are unable to know whether he has old friendship before acquaintance with Watson. It seems that Holmes is a solitary animal by nature. But Holmes does love Watson. He keeps in touch with Watson after they have lived apart.

After all, Holmes is a human just like us. He needs friendship despite how estranged it is. He unfortunately can’t find anyone similar to him. So he finds a substitution, Watson.

B.      The Definition of Their Relationship by Watson

He has no family left and Holmes seems to be his closest friend.

Like Doyle, Watson is a physician with a military background. Like his creator, Watson has money-troubles, betting his army pension on the horses and losing it in gambling. In The Dancing Men, we learn that Holmes keeps Watson’s chequebook locked in a drawer of his desk, where the good doctor cannot get at it and spend his money unwisely.

Watson trusts Holmes just like the latter was his guardian.

1.        The Consideration of Holmes as His Friend by Watson

It’s been said that we like Sherlock Holmes because Watson likes him. We see him through Watson’s eyes and we can feel the fascination Watson has for Holmes. Sometimes, Watson even resembles Holmes’s relative. When Holmes throws off his wife-to-be, Watson seems to be much more regretful than Holmes, if the latter felt any regret at all.

2.        Need for Holmes

Watson adores Holmes rather than loves him.

Holmes refuses that Watson go along with him to steal a letter. Watson becomes angry and even threatens to turn him in. Watson feels pride of being Holmes’s partner.







破晓时分的柏树林

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 柏之晓shiloh打开柏之晓的博客
3 楼: Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论文 12年06月04日20点40分

I.        Holmes’s Justice

“And also with the result of causing it to turn upon its master at the other side, some of the blows of my cane came home and roused its snakish temper, so that it flew upon the first person it saw. In this way I am no doubt indirectly responsible for Dr. Grimesloy Roylott’s death, and I cannot say that it is likely to weigh very heavily upon my conscience.” (Doyle, 1892)

It’s too difficult to abstract justice. In some extreme conditions, one cannot do anything which is exact justice, nor can one do nothing without guilty conscience.

A.     The Difference between a Detective and a Policeman

A detective may forgive a criminal while a policeman always performs his duty.

Holmes’s duty differs from the police’s duty on the purposes and approaches. Holmes’s investigation is independent and private, while the police’s investigation depends on a whole institution and is more outward. Holmes serves his client while the police serves the government. Holmes always saunters gracefully on the edge of illegality, while the police stands for the law.

1.        The Principle of a Policeman

A policeman is responsible for his superior while a detective stands for his client. A policeman is much less free than a detective. A policeman has to accord with the law even if he is reluctant.

All the policemen compose a hierarchy system which serves for tools.

2.        The Principle of a Detective

One case of Holmes has been debatable for a long period. The cause is nothing but the option between legality and illegality. It is too hard to choose one option. Either of them is evil. Even as you give up the option, you have done another evil.

In Milverton’s house, they witness a cold-blooded murder. Holmes confronts two options for the second time, to help the victim, or to keep quiet. He watches throughout the procedure of murder, and conceals the truth during the inquiry by the police.

    Indeed, Milverton is a criminal person. But his crimes can’t cause him to face the death penalty. Holmes has protected his client by violating the personal and property right of Milverton. The essentials of the options are the decision between one’s life and many others’ reputation.

    Holmes’s answer is not the sole one.

    “I suppose that you will admit that the action is morally justifiable, though technically criminal. Since it is morally justifiable, I have only to consider the question of personal risk. Surely a gentleman should not lay much stress upon this, when a lady is in most desperate need of his help? I must abandon my client to her fate or I must play this last card. Between ourselves, Watson, it’s a sporting duel between this fellow Milverton and me. He had, as you saw, the best of the first exchanges, but my self-respect and my reputation are concerned to fight it to a finish.” (Doyle, 1891)

B.      A Forgiving Holmes

Some severe murder is forgivable in Holmes’s opinion. On the other hand, some criminals are due to die even though they haven’t killed anyone.

1.        Criminals in Holmes’s View Point

“Do you feel a creeping, shrinking sensation, Watson, when you stand before the serpents in the Zoo, and see the slithery, gliding, venomous creatures, with their deadly eyes and wicked, flattened faces? Well, that’s how Milverton impresses me. I’ve had to do with fifty murders in my career, but the worst of them never gave me the repulsion which I have for this fellow.

He is the king of all the blackmailers. Heaven help the man, and still more the woman, whose secret and reputation come into the power of Milverton! With a smiling face and a heart of marble, he squeeze and squeeze until he has drained them dry.” (Doyle, 1904)

Milverton has made the worst impression of all the criminals in Holmes’s memory. Holmes treats Milverton’s doom with indifference. Then he prevents Watson from helping Milverton. At last, he refuses to assist the police in seizing the criminal. In one word, he merely stands for his own conscience rather than the justice.

2.        Another Sort of Criminal

There is without a doubt a darker side to Holmes that could almost be feared. I personally don’t like the idea of him being a criminal or murderer, but there is no doubt that you’d not be able to catch him if he does decide to ever turn that way.

“No interference upon our part could have saved the man from his fate, but, as the woman poured bullet after bullet into Milverton’s shrinking body I was about to spring out, when I felt Holmes’s cold, strong grasp upon my wrist…that justice had overtaken a villain…” (Doyle, 1904)

    “I think there are certain crimes which the law cannot touch, and which therefore, to some extent, justify private revenge. No, it’s no use arguing. I have make up my mind. My sympathies are with the criminals rather than with the victim, and I will not handle this case.” (Doyle, 1904)







破晓时分的柏树林

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 铁的泉铁泉打开铁的泉的博客
4 楼: Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论文 12年06月04日20点51分

LZ什么专业?






Your soul is mine!

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 奇探贼魔奇探贼魔
5 楼: Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论文 12年06月04日21点11分

这个题目在教师面前算是冷门还是热门呢。


如果他们相当熟悉Holmes的cases,那么一定很会挑刺;如果他们只是闻其大名、未闻其详,那么又不太容易提起兴致,甚至觉得不知所云,因为文中涉及了具体案例和具体人物、情节。所以,最好的情况是——他们读过、有印象,但并不精通!


PS: 好久不阅读了,看起来好吃力,没勇气读完。。。








我在明与暗之间穿梭,用超然的手法制造和破解一桩桩离奇事件...
http://weibo.com/maxsaint


※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 福尔摩斯福尔摩斯版
6 楼: Re:Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论... 12年06月04日21点18分

楼主介意改为中英文对照吗?这样可以帮助大家阅读。


如果担心花费时间的话,可以发我邮箱,代楼主修改。


 








推理之门—主题版区——福尔摩斯版欢迎您!

欢迎光临,这里是福尔摩斯迷的乐园!

福尔摩斯之域QQ群:54024312

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 柏之晓shiloh打开柏之晓的博客
7 楼: Re:Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的英文论... 12年06月04日21点29分




【奇探贼魔在大作中谈到:】

这个题目在教师面前算是冷门还是热门呢。



如果他们相当熟悉Holmes的cases,那么一定很会挑刺;如果他们只是闻其大名、未闻其详,那么又不太容易提起兴致,甚至觉得不知所云,因为文中涉及了具体案例和具体人物、情节。所以,最好的情况是——他们读过、有印象,但并不精通!



PS: 好久不阅读了,看起来好吃力,没勇气读完。。。



他们提出的问题:


为什么说福尔摩斯是另一种罪犯


如何精确定义福尔摩斯和华生的关系


当正义与法律冲突,如何解决








破晓时分的柏树林

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 柏之晓shiloh打开柏之晓的博客
8 楼: Re:Re:Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的... 12年06月04日21点35分




【福尔摩斯在大作中谈到:】

楼主介意改为中英文对照吗?这样可以帮助大家阅读。



如果担心花费时间的话,可以发我邮箱,代楼主修改。



 

如果要找汉语译文的话,本版的一些精华帖就是。我只是概括总结后翻译成英文。







破晓时分的柏树林

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 福尔摩斯福尔摩斯版
9 楼: Re:Re:Re:Re:以福尔摩斯为... 12年06月04日21点51分




【柏之晓在大作中谈到:】






【福尔摩斯在大作中谈到:】

楼主介意改为中英文对照吗?这样可以帮助大家阅读。




如果担心花费时间的话,可以发我邮箱,代楼主修改。




 

如果要找汉语译文的话,本版的一些精华帖就是。我只是概括总结后翻译成英文。

楼主介意把概括总结的中文拿出来分享吗?


[此贴被福尔摩斯于2012-6-4 21:53:57修改过]






推理之门—主题版区——福尔摩斯版欢迎您!

欢迎光临,这里是福尔摩斯迷的乐园!

福尔摩斯之域QQ群:54024312

※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

 奇探贼魔奇探贼魔
10 楼: Re:Re:Re:以福尔摩斯为主题的... 12年06月04日21点55分




【柏之晓在大作中谈到:】






【奇探贼魔在大作中谈到:】

这个题目在教师面前算是冷门还是热门呢。




如果他们相当熟悉Holmes的cases,那么一定很会挑刺;如果他们只是闻其大名、未闻其详,那么又不太容易提起兴致,甚至觉得不知所云,因为文中涉及了具体案例和具体人物、情节。所以,最好的情况是——他们读过、有印象,但并不精通!




PS: 好久不阅读了,看起来好吃力,没勇气读完。。。




他们提出的问题:



为什么说福尔摩斯是另一种罪犯



如何精确定义福尔摩斯和华生的关系



当正义与法律冲突,如何解决


他们也挺无聊的。。。


1.如果非要强词夺理说福尔摩斯是另一种罪犯


那么狭义上,我记得他私闯民宅(很多例子)、扣留人(见《身份案》)等手段算是了,广义上福尔摩斯这部作品似乎也在介绍各种巧妙的犯罪手法,算是教唆?!


2.至于福和华的关系
 我觉得正统点说是与某种人或物长久相处后的依恋(无视BL的歪谈),当华婚后,福则显得更加消沉、孤独。华闯进他的生活又退出他的生活,虽然进来时带给他友谊和温暖(虽然他自己一直固执地认为从不需要这些),但离开后他的心境变得还不如从前。总得来说显意识努力去回避的东西正是潜意识努力要寻求的。


3.正义与法律的问题


首先真要揣测下教师他们本身的观点,再投其所好、或者模棱两可玩太极。既然是天朝公民,那么还是要强调法律和社会秩序性的重要、正义的相对性、要用法律手段使正义达到最大化、反对个人主义的狭隘正义观等等。(但是在硬汉派和骑士小说中,永远是正义高于一切,我也更倾向于这点呵)








我在明与暗之间穿梭,用超然的手法制造和破解一桩桩离奇事件...
http://weibo.com/maxsaint


※来源: 【 推理之门 Tuili.Com 】.

[1] [2]1页/共2页(总计17个回复) 下页
每次上网自动访问推理之门   |    将推理之门加入收藏夹
邮件联系:zhejiong@126.com  沪ICP备2021006552号  沪公网安备31011502006128号  推理之门  版权所有 2000-2024